Martindale-Hubbell - Badge
American Alliance of Disability Attorneys Founding Member - Badge
Super Lawyers - Badge

Court Decision Underscores Important Role of Disability Attorneys

Bonny G. Rafel, LLC

A recent Seventh Circuit decision illustrates that pursuing a claim for disability benefits is not as straightforward as claimants would hope, and that claimants must follow ERISA’s requirements to the letter in order to obtain the benefits they deserve. In Schorsch v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., No. 10-3524 (7th Cir. Aug. 28, 2012), Reliance paid Schorsch’s disability benefits for almost 14 years before it denied her claim based on an independent medical evaluation (“IME”). Schorsch’s attorney sent Reliance a letter indicating his intent to appeal the denial, but never submitted a formal appeal. Reliance subsequently sent Schorsch a letter stating that its decision to deny the plaintiff’s benefits was final as she had not filed her appeal within ERISA’s prescribed time frame. Schorsch sued and Reliance revealed during discovery that it had lost the administrative record, including the surveillance that it had conducted of Schorsch. Discovery also revealed that Reliance’s denial letter misrepresented that a particular vocational specialist who in fact never looked at Schorsch’s file issued a report supporting termination of benefits.

The Court ruled in favor of Reliance, holding that Reliance’s loss of the plaintiff’s claim file (and other errors in its claim handling) did not excuse the plaintiff’s failure to file her claim within the required time period. See ERISA Regulations, 29 C.F.R. 2560.503-1(h)(3)(i). The Court stated “Schorsch cannot circumvent ERISA’s administrative remedies by simply pointing to errors in Reliance’s claims termination process. Flaws in Reliance’s termination notice and other errors become relevant only if Schorsch reasonably relied on them in failing to request a review of its decision to terminate her disability benefits…or if Reliance’s missteps denied her meaningful access to a review.” The court ruled that Reliance’s errors were unrelated to Schorsch’s own failure to file a timely appeal.

The Schorsch case illustrates that ERISA can be difficult to navigate, with numerous traps for the unwary and protections favoring insurers. Do not jeapordize the benefits you deserve by venturing into these waters on you own. We at Bonny G. Rafel are experts in this ever-developing area of the law, and will zealously guard your rights as an insured under your ERISA policy.

By Sara E. Kaplan, Esq.

Client Reviews

I was an Engineer in a Research and Development division of a major corporation, putting in longer hours with the same workload. An unrelated episode landed me in the hospital, where I was DXd with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, which explained my decline at work. I then learned that I had...

Charlie

I would like to re-acknowledge what a difference your work has made in my life. When forced to retire 5 years ago, you dedication to helping me enroll into my disability policy has made all of the world of difference.

George

I cannot thank you enough for successfully appealing my disability benefits. My special thanks also to Eileen for all of their assistance, support and expertise. Your legal expertise of disability benefit entitlement was evidenced by your comprehensive and knowledgeable litigation of my appeal. I...

MaryJo